Timothée Chalamet and Florence Pugh in Little Women.
Columbia Pictures
Despite being only a child at the story’s beginning, Amy March is perhaps the most divisive character in Little Women, either a materialistic manuscript-burner or a misunderstood dreamer, depending on who you ask. But so far critics are united in how they feel about the character in Greta Gerwig’s upcoming adaptation of the novel, which screened Wednesday night in Los Angeles. Predictably, there was plenty of praise for star Saoirse Ronan as Jo March, but a surprising amount of adoration was directed at Florence Pugh as the youngest March sister.
The movie’s release on Dec. 25 will cap off a meteoric year for 23-year-old Pugh, who had her first lead role in Fighting With My Family and then starred in Ari Aster’s Midsommar. (If you haven’t already learned how to properly pronounce her name, now’s the time. It’s “pew,” like the Star Wars gun noise, not “pooh” like the hungry bear or the grinning emoji.) Whereas the 1994 adaptation of Little Women saw two actresses, Kirsten Dunst and Samantha Mathis, play Amy at different ages, Pugh flies solo here. And from the sound of it, that choice pays off:
Get Slate Culture in Your Inbox
The best of movies, TV, books, music, and more, delivered three times a week.
Other early reactions praised Meryl Streep (obviously) as well as Gerwig’s treatment of the source material. Kyle Buchanan tweeted that the movie’s flashback structure is “Little Women meets 21 Grams” while David Sims called it “a genuinely thrilling adaptation that actually wrestles with the book rather than just render it.” But just how much does it incorporate the rest of the Louisa May Alcott expanded universe? We’ll have to wait and see.
Readers like you make our work possible. Help us continue to provide the reporting, commentary and criticism you won’t find anywhere else.
Join Slate Plusfrom Slate Magazine https://ift.tt/32KymfI
via IFTTT
沒有留言:
張貼留言