2015年1月31日 星期六
Yellow Balls in W33
NASA Budget Preview
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1yVwGs4
via IFTTT
NASA Launches Groundbreaking Soil Moisture Mapping Satellite
January 31, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/1DqvgdI
via IFTTT
SMAP Takes to the Skies
Remembering Charles Townes
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1yY1Jbs
via IFTTT
SMAP Launched
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1EwpLxC
via IFTTT
2015年1月30日 星期五
A Night at Poker Flat
Camera now measuring even fainter Near-Earth Objects
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1A90M1Q
via IFTTT
Astronauts Speak with University of California Students from Space Station
January 30, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/167urvS
via IFTTT
NASA TV Coverage Set for NOAA DSCOVR Launch Feb. 8
January 30, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/1yg6TMa
via IFTTT
Launch of NASA Soil Moisture Mapping Mission Set for Saturday
January 30, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/1vhaUV5
via IFTTT
NASA's Invitation-Only Stealth Tweetup is Underway at JSC
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1zeMIlY
via IFTTT
Talking to Pluto is hard! Why it takes so long to get data back from New Horizons
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1JUBDd3
via IFTTT
Dawn Journal: Closing in on Ceres
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1CH593K
via IFTTT
Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel: Lack of Transparency in Commercial Space
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1JU7tqg
via IFTTT
Meet the New Boss, Very Much NOT The Same As the Old Boss
For those of you who don’t follow me on Twitter, I recently linked to an article that I think is very mportant. It was written by my friend Hank Green, about the reactions to his recent interview with President Obama.
Hank, as you may know, makes amazing YouTube videos about all manners of topics, with the overarching goal of making the world a better place. This isn’t some treacly greeting-card sentiment; Hank (and his brother John, and their team of amazing young people creating videos) honestly and openly want everyone to be better people. Their motto is “Don’t Forget To Be Awesome”. And they mean it.
Hank, along with YouTube creators Bethany Mota and Glozell Green, interviewed the President, asking him questions that were important to their audience. These included the government’s use of drones, Net Neutrality, Boko Haram, and racial tension. These questions were unflinching, unapologetic, and discussed without the manufactured “both sides” baloney so common in mainstream media.
The reaction to this by some of that same media was as predictable as it was maddening: disbelief and derision. This is what inspired Hank to write his article. I strongly urge you to read it.
Hank calls these older news sources “legacy media”, which is an interesting term. He describes how these current news media inherited their positions of popularity, as opposed to earning it; they’re not the same venues they once were. A lot of their inroads into our society, their ability to get their message out, is based on their past when things were very different.
And the trust they rely on now has, in many cases, been squandered if not cynically exploited and outright betrayed. The 24 hour news cycle is a huge factor in this, I think; that is a lot of time to fill, and nonsense loves to occupy that space. But corporate ownership is a huge part of the problem, especially when the owners are dogmatic ideologues with an agenda.
Apropos of that, one of my favorite parts of Hank’s article was his response to a tweet by Rupert Murdoch. The head of NewsCorp (the right-wing company that owns Fox News) tweeted this:
Hank’s response was perfect. Perfect.
As Hank points out in his article, the average age of Fox viewers is not exactly young. Young folks in high school and college don’t get their news from Fox (or CNN or even MSNBC); they’re far more likely to get it from The Daily Show, from links on social media, and on YouTube.
It’s incredibly trite, but it’s true nonetheless: The future is online. A big chunk of the legacy media still haven’t quite figured this out. They just slap their printed or TV content online and call it good, but that’s not the way things work (or, at the least, it's not enough). And they’re starting from the wrong premise anyway. Younger folks don’t want to see five old rich white guys yelling at each other about women’s rights. They want a thoughtful take on it, from people who represent them better.
People like Hank, Mota, Green, and so many others have spent a lot of time being themselves online, and have built a huge capital of trust. That’s why their audience numbers in the many, many millions.
It’s not too late for legacy media. All they have to do is win our trust back. But trust is earned, not given, and earning that trust is hard work, something I don’t see too many in the old school doing much of. Resting on their legacy is how they got to this dying cul-de-sac in the first place*.
I have no specific solutions, no road map for legacy media to save themselves. This is new territory, and it's being mapped out as it's being discovered. Maybe we just have to wait for the old media to die off... but that’ll take a while. They still have a lot of money, and a maniacal grip on a lot of politicians.
But there’s hope; the President did speak to this new group, and he did reach their younger audience.
What I can hope for is that an entire new generation will reach their adulthood having grown up under the tutelage of this new wave of media, and absorb those principles. All they need to do is don’t forget to be awesome.
I’ll leave you with this: The Presidential interview. It’s really quite good.
* I’ll note that Slate started as a totally online magazine, which is one of the reasons it’s still going strong, and one of the reasons I was happy to hitch my wagon to them. They understand online culture, and don’t carry the baggage of Old Media.
from Bad Astronomy http://ift.tt/15OLaDA
via IFTTT
2015年1月29日 星期四
Close Encounter with M44
Crash Course Astronomy Episode 3: Cycles in the Sky
You live on a whirling ball of rock and metal. As it spins it also revolves around the Sun, and all this is set in a backdrop of thousands of visible but much more distant stars … and on top of that, there are other planets in the solar system moving around as well.
What does all this look like? Why, that’s the very topic of Episode 3 of Crash Course Astronomy: Cycles in the Sky.
When I sat down to write the syllabus (and later the scripts) for this series, the topic of motions in the sky was one I approached with a bit of trepidation. It’s not easy for most folks to picture how all this works; it can be hard to visualize what’s going on, especially when you’re changing your viewpoint from what’s physically happening (the Earth is spinning, the Earth is tilted, the Earth is moving around the Sun) to what you’re seeing from the Earth (stars rise and set, some stars are forever below the horizon from your latitude, stars change their position over the year).
I hope this episode makes this a little bit easier to understand. If it’s still hard to grasp some of this, that’s OK! It’s always hard at first; it was hard for me. I’ve been doing this a long time now though, so I have a lot of experience going outside and seeing how all these celestial gears fit together. It’s actually a fascinating feeling, looking up and knowing that everything is in motion, and it’s all working under the rules of gravity, momentum, geometry … things we can understand and predict. All the parts are working!
And you can be a part of this too. Go outside and look up. And not just tonight, but tomorrow, and the next night, and the next. Keep looking up. Get to know the night sky, its starry denizens, and its motions. It really is an amazing experience.
Wanna watch more Crash Course Astronomy? The playlist is on YouTube.
from Bad Astronomy http://ift.tt/1yGkdZa
via IFTTT
UPDATE -- NASA Hosts Media, Social Media for “State of NASA” Events at Agency Centers
January 29, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/1z9FzDD
via IFTTT
NASA Invites Media, Social Media to Major Space Launch System Booster Test
January 29, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/1vaXF8h
via IFTTT
NASA TV Coverage Reset for Launch of Newest Earth-Observing Mission
January 29, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/1yaquNL
via IFTTT
How NASA's Budget Request Comes Together: Part 1
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1CPZ6u2
via IFTTT
Another Interesting NASA Event You Can't Listen To
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1z8gDwl
via IFTTT
Valorie Burr
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1BtVjxS
via IFTTT
Laser Rocket Aurora!
This is one of the coolest pictures I’ve ever seen. And bonus: It’s science!
Geez, where to start? OK, this is the Poker Flat Research Range in Alaska, where NASA launches what are called sounding rockets. These are not as big as rockets you might be used to, but they’re still hefty enough to get a payload up as high as 300 km.
On Jan. 26, 2015, four such rockets were launched. In this wide-angle composite picture, you can see the fiery trails of the rocket as they headed skyward (I suspect the exposure started late or was interrupted for the launch on the right, since it starts already off the ground).
In each, you can see where the first stage booster cuts out, and the engine glow gets much dimmer. Then, higher up, the second stage ignites, propelling its payload even higher. The first stage booster continues up on a parabolic arc, then begins to fall. If you trace those arcs down, you’ll even see the impact points on the ground! That’s pretty wild.
The weird feathery glow is part of one of the scientific experiments launched. Called MIST, for Mesospheric Inversion-layer Stratified Turbulence, it releases a compound called tri-methyl aluminum (TMA) tracer, which creates white expanding clouds. The shape of the cloud can be used to measure the amount of turbulence in the mesosphere, the layer of atmosphere about the stratosphere. The experiment was done in part to see how various molecules in the air are transported vertically in the upper atmosphere.
On the left you can see a green beam; that’s a powerful laser shot up into the air to measure atmospheric conditions at different altitudes.
Of course, the green glowy stuff everywhere is the aurora. And finally, the streaks in the sky are stars! These were time exposures, so the stars moved during the photographs, circling the north pole of the sky (called the celestial pole). Normally you’d see Polaris, the North Star, right in the center of those arcs, but it’s hidden by one of the TMA clouds.
And this gets even better: Here’s stunning video of the whole thing, too:
I love science, I really do. But sometimes, I have to wonder: How much of that is because people get to do really, really cool stuff like this?
Tip o' the nose cone to Wigi Tozzi for the link to the video.
from Bad Astronomy http://ift.tt/1yD81Ze
via IFTTT
2015年1月28日 星期三
Comet Lovejoy in a Winter Sky
Commercial Crew Rivalries: Fun to Watch, Everybody Wins
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1zCpsA5
via IFTTT
NASA Hosts Media, Social Media for “State of NASA” Events at Agency Centers
January 28, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/1ttE2Hr
via IFTTT
NASA's Aerospace Safety Advisory Panel Releases 2014 Annual Report
January 28, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/1BqzbVb
via IFTTT
Remembrance
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/15P9yEJ
via IFTTT
NASA's Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) Ready for Jan. 29 Launch
2015年1月27日 星期二
Our Galaxys Magnetic Field from Planck
Ceres: Just a little bit closer (and officially better than Hubble)
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1D6hHQd
via IFTTT
New Falcon Heavy Animation
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1uydIHA
via IFTTT
A second ringed centaur? Centaurs with rings could be common
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/18q701J
via IFTTT
A View of the 2015 Blizzard
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1uYTqN7
via IFTTT
Astronomers Find Ancient Earth-Sized Planets in Our Galactic Backyard
Astronomers have announced what may be the most interesting exoplanet discovery yet made: five planets, all smaller than Earth, orbiting a very ancient star. And I do mean ancient: Its age is estimated to be more than 11 billion years old, far older than the Sun. These are old, old planets!
There’s a lot going on here, as far as the science goes. Let me explain. No, there is too much. Let me sum up. Here are the bullet points:
- The planets were found using the Kepler space telescope, which uses the transit method: If a star has planets, and we see those orbits edge-on, the planets pass in front of their star as seen from Earth. This blocks a bit of the light, and we can measure that. The amount of light blocked (compared with known properties of the star like its size) tells us how big the planet is. The length of time it takes the planet to transit the star also gives us its orbital period, orbital size, and an estimate of its temperature.
- The star is called Kepler-444. It’s a bit cooler, more orange, and smaller than the Sun (a K0 dwarf, if you want the details), and is about 117 light-years from Earth. That’s relatively close! Amazingly, it’s actually a triple-star system: There’s a pair of cool red M dwarfs orbiting each other, and the pair in turn orbits the K star. The binary is about 10 billion kilometers from the K star, about twice the distance Neptune is from the Sun.
- The five planets orbit the primary K star, and are called Kepler-444b up to Kepler-444f. All five are smaller than Earth, and get bigger in order with their distance from the star: Kepler-444b has a diameter of 0.403 Earth, Kepler-444c is 0.497 Earth, d is 0.530, e is 0.546, and f is the biggest at 0.741 our home planet’s size.
- The planets are not in any way Earthlike! The system is very compact; all five planets are quite close to their parent star—even the most distant one, planet f, is closer to its star than Mercury is to the Sun—and therefore pretty hot. They all orbit the star in fewer than 10 days. They’re pretty well cooked.
- The system is very old. This was determined using a method called astroseismology, a bit like using earthquakes to observe the Earth’s interior. In this case, the surface of the star vibrates, like standing waves in a bathtub or the way a drumhead vibrates. The character of these waves depends on a lot of the physical properties of the star: its density, mass, surface gravity, size, and age. Very careful observations taken over many weeks were used to get the astroseismological results, and the age was found to be about 11.2 billion years, give or take a billion years. (I’ll note that in part this work was funded through the Pale Blue Dot project, which lets people adopt a star for a small fee that goes toward astroseismology research. Previously, the smallest exoplanet found used research funded through this group, too! And someone named Brian Finley had adopted Kepler-444, so congrats to him, too.)
- Assuming the planets formed along with the star—a reasonable assumption—these planets have been around a long, long time. The Universe itself is 13.8 billion years old, and the Milky Way galaxy somewhat younger. These stars and planets formed when the Universe itself was young. Put it this way: When the Sun and Earth formed, these planets were already older than the Sun and Earth are now.
So what does all this mean?
Quite a bit, actually. For one, until now we weren’t sure just how old planets could be. We’ve found some Earth-sized planets older than us, but none this old.
Initially, the Universe was almost all hydrogen and helium, with the heavier stuff coming later. The iron and nickel in the Earth, for example, were formed in supernovae, massive stars that exploded billions of years ago. As the Universe ages, it gets more and more of these elements as more of these big stars explode.
When Kepler-444 formed, there were relatively fewer of these heavy elements, and spectra of the star confirm a paucity of elements like iron. We’ve discovered enough exoplanets now that we see an interesting relationship between heavy elements and planets: Gas giants (like Jupiter and Saturn) tend to form around stars that have more heavy elements; these elements aid in the formation of larger planets. But when you look at smaller, more Earth-sized planets, that relationship goes away. Smaller planets form around stars that have lots of heavy elements, and they also form around stars that have relatively few.
The Kepler-444 system supports this. A gas giant planet would’ve been seen, so it looks like these five planets are all it has (or the biggest it has), and each is small and presumably rocky.
But what of life?
Let me remind you, these planets are flippin’ hot. The coolest most likely has a surface temperature way above the boiling point of water. I wouldn’t think there could be life there.
But don’t be so specific. Take a step back and realize that what this means is that Earth-sized planets could form around Sunlike stars even 11 billion years ago! That may have profound implications for life.
You may have heard of the Fermi paradox: If life is easy to get started on planets, then where are the aliens? We do know that life formed on Earth not too long after the planet’s crust had cooled enough to support it. Let’s say it takes 4 billion years for those protozoa to evolve and build spaceships. It turns out that, even with the vast distances between stars and limiting your ships to far less than the speed of light, you can colonize the entire galaxy in just a few million years. That’s far less than the age of the galaxy.
Perhaps you see the problem. If planets like Earth formed 11 billion years ago, and happened to form at the right distance for more clement conditions on the surface, life could have arisen long enough ago and started building spaceships long before the Earth even formed! They’d have planted their flags on every Earth-sized habitable planet in the Milky Way by now.
Where are they?
We don’t know. There are two many “maybes.” Maybe Earth is special in some way that made life easier to form here. Maybe you need iron and nickel to build spaceships (but even then there are planets a billion or two years older than us that would’ve had plenty of such elements). Maybe evolution doesn’t always work its way to intelligence. Maybe every civilization advanced enough to manipulate its environment did so to its own detriment (cough cough). Maybe they blew themselves up. Maybe they’re out there but so advanced we don’t even recognize them.
Maybe we’re just the first.
That’s always been an idea in my back pocket to explain the Fermi paradox. Someone has to be the first. But that’s a bit tougher to swallow when you see rocky planets that are more than twice as old as our own home planet. Eleven billion years is a long time.
Clearly, we just don’t have all the information yet. We’re just getting started here! We’ve discovered thousands of planets orbiting other stars, but there are probably billions of them out there. Billions! We have a lot more data to collect, a lot more information to analyze, and a lot more thinking to do before we can solve this particular mystery.
But we’re working on it. Kepler-444 and its five, small, melted, ancient worlds are just one small piece of a puzzle that is vast and deep. And they’re a good start.
from Bad Astronomy http://ift.tt/1zqLy8H
via IFTTT
Sounding Rockets Launch Into an Aurora
NASA’s Dawn Spacecraft Captures Best-Ever View of Dwarf Planet
January 27, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/1uXWkSh
via IFTTT
Rosetta Catches a Comet’s Snowflakes on Its Tongue
I’ve seen a lot of stuff when it comes to space science and astronomy, and sure, I’m easily excited about it all … but still, it takes a lot to get me to boggle at something.
So this is me, boggling: This photo below shows grains of comet dust caught on the fly by the Rosetta spacecraft!
Yeah. That is very, very cool.
To be more accurate, they’re the remains of comet dust caught on the fly by the Rosetta spacecraft. OK, let me explain.
Comets are essentially dust, gravel, and rocks packed together by various types of ice. Generally speaking, we’re talking water, carbon dioxide, ammonia, carbon monoxide, and other things that are usually gaseous on Earth, but which are frozen in the depths of space.
Lots of comets orbit the Sun on long, elliptical paths, taking them out into the black, then back in closer to the Sun. As they near the Sun, the ice turns into a gas and blows off, and the other junk making up the comet are blown into space as well.
The Rosetta spacecraft is currently following along a comet, called 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko. It orbits the Sun once every 6.5 years, going out as far as Jupiter’s orbit (it’s called a Jupiter-family comet, in fact, a member of many comets with similar orbits), dropping down to just outside Earth’s orbit. As I write this, the comet is about 370 million kilometers from the Sun, a bit more than twice Earth’s distance, and still outside the orbit of Mars.
Still, that’s close enough that it’s already becoming active, and we see streams of gas flowing out of it. That means dust particles are coming off too. The thing is, “dust” is a somewhat generic term for tiny flakes of stuff that can have wildly different compositions. Rosetta is in the unique position to find out what 67/P’s dust is made of. So engineers and scientists gave it a shot.
That shot is COSIMA, the Cometary Secondary Ion Mass Analyser. Have you ever been in a snowfall and caught snowflakes on your tongue? That’s COSIMA, except it has a plate exposed to space instead of a tongue, and instead of snowflakes it’s catching, well, comet snowflakes.
When 67/P was still more than 450 million km from the Sun, and just 30 km from the comet, Rosetta caught several flakes of material from the comet. They impacted the plate at speeds of just 1–10 meters per second, roughly bicycling speed. The photo above shows two such specimens (the scale bars represent 500 and 300 microns, where a human hair is roughly 100 microns wide).
When they hit the plate they fragmented. If there had been lots of ice in them, they would have been held together better and wouldn’t have shattered, so right away this tells us the flakes were dry (not like Earth snowflakes at all). They also have a high sodium content, which matches lots of other interplanetary dust particles, particularly meteoroids that burn up in our atmosphere during meteor showers. We know those come from comets, so that checks out! This means we’ve actually found a sample of the parent material of meteor showers. Cool.
But what’s also interesting is what this means for the surface of the comet. These particles were emitted when the comet “turned on” again, getting close enough to the Sun to become active. Scientists think these grains were actually left over from the last time 67/P came ‘round the Sun. As the comet began to head away from the Sun, the flow of gas outward weakened, and wasn’t strong enough to lift dust away. That material then sat on the surface, and was lifted off as the outflow became strong once again a few months ago.
That outer mantle of older dust will be shed, and then more stuff deeper down will start to get flung away. When this happens the dust content may change, possibly showing us other types of material as well. Rosetta will be around for that; it will follow the comet for many more months as it gets to its closest point to the Sun (called perihelion). The comet should become more active, and we’ll get to investigate what lies beneath.
That to me is incredibly exciting. We know a lot about comets, but the devil’s in the details, and every comet is different. Heck, even a single comet changes a lot over the course of a single orbit, so by monitoring 67/P for several months, we’ll learn a lot about these weird beasts. And that’s the whole point.
from Bad Astronomy http://ift.tt/1y2WeVd
via IFTTT
2015年1月26日 星期一
The Milky Way over the Seven Strong Men Rock Formations
Denise Stewart
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1H1VdWK
via IFTTT
NASA Observes Day of Remembrance
January 26, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/15Dy5we
via IFTTT
First Commercial Crew Test Flights in 2017
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1LcfRTA
via IFTTT
At last! A slew of OSIRIS images shows fascinating landscapes on Rosetta's comet
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1JPB9Tv
via IFTTT
Negative Progress Towards Putting Humans on Mars
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1BfDfHP
via IFTTT
Rocky Mountain National Park Viewed From the International Space Station
It's Official: LightSail Test Flight Scheduled for May 2015
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1BdNnki
via IFTTT
2015年1月25日 星期日
A Twisted Solar Eruptive Prominence
Everyone Wins at Google Lunar X Prize
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1EKvHAA
via IFTTT
2015年1月24日 星期六
Light from Cygnus A
2015年1月23日 星期五
Interior View
Addressing some common questions about Comet Lovejoy
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1JjdIDV
via IFTTT
USAF Blinks and SpaceX Wins EELV Concessions
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1z0gPiy
via IFTTT
2015年1月22日 星期四
Launch to Lovejoy
Field Report from Mars: Sol 3902 - January 15, 2015
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1EyfvCe
via IFTTT
Mike Gazarik Is Leaving NASA
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/15h6Lnm
via IFTTT
UPDATE - NASA, Boeing, SpaceX Discuss Plan for Launching American Astronauts from the U.S. in 2017
January 22, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/1CjJePT
via IFTTT
MoonEx To Us SLC-36
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1Jnv9RO
via IFTTT
Fountains of Water Vapor and Ice
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1AU0K9k
via IFTTT
Greenland's Leidy Glacier
2015年1月21日 星期三
The Complex Ion Tail of Comet Lovejoy
Curiosity update, sols 814-863: Pahrump Hills Walkabout, part 2
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1ytWHmY
via IFTTT
The President's 2016 Budget Is Coming
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1EtnEb2
via IFTTT
Milky Way Moonset
Michael Shainblum is a photographer whose favorite target is the Milky Way (though he took one of the most amazing photos of 2014, lightning hitting the Burj Khalifa, the tallest building in the world).
He sent me a note recently that he caught an unusual scene in Big Sur, California, and, well, take a look:
How cool is that? The Milky Way is almost exactly vertical, plunging down into the Pfeiffer Beach Keyhole Rock, a natural arch carved by erosion. But what’s that glow in the hole? That’s the crescent Moon, setting into the horizon but blocked by the rock itself. The Moon’s path across the sky against the background stars passes fairly close to the center of our spiral galaxy, which we see edge-on because we’re inside it.
This shot is a mosaic of five panels, going from nearly to the zenith down to the rocks at the foot of the tripod supporting the camera. I suspect the subtle illumination of the arch is from the rocks, water, and beach that were lit by the Moon; their back-reflection would then light up the side of the arch facing the camera.
I’ve seen a lot of photos of the Milky Way on the sky, so sometimes you really need to pick your foreground—and the timing—just right to get a photo that really stands out.
You can see more of Shainbum's work on his Facebook page, too.
from Bad Astronomy http://ift.tt/1J8Rrsl
via IFTTT
Asteroid Abduction
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1CPUS3k
via IFTTT
Two New Planets in the Solar System? Not So Fast, Folks.
A team of astronomers made something of a news splash late last week when they announced they have indirect evidence that there could be one or more massive planets orbiting in the solar system well beyond Neptune.
I read their journal paper, and their argument is certainly interesting (I’ll explain it in a sec). But let me be clear here: Their evidence of any possible planets out past Neptune is indirect (they don’t have photos or anything like that), it’s based on a small number of objects, and we do have evidence that there aren’t really big (like gas giant–sized) planets past Neptune. And it pains me to even have to bring this up, but of course this has nothing to do with Nibiru crackpottery, either.
Bottom line: To me, this is an interesting and potentially promising line of research, but right now it is quite inconclusive about the existence of planet-sized bodies past Neptune.
How this works isn’t that hard to understand in principle. (Note: After writing this but before posting it, I found that the AstroBites blog also discusses this topic, with more technical info.) In our solar system we have the Sun at the center, and it pretty much runs everything. It has 98 percent of the mass of the solar system, so its gravity is in charge of how everything else moves. BUT, there are also planets that have gravity as well. Their gravity is weak compared with the Sun’s but is strong enough that, given time, the planets can affect the orbits of other objects.
Out past Neptune is a region occupied by objects that are similar to asteroids but made of ice instead of metal and rock (making them more like comets, really). There are various names for them, but in general they’re called trans-Neptunian objects, or TNOs. Some are on circular orbits, some more elliptical, some have orbits tipped to the plane of the solar system, some don’t.
A handful, about a dozen discovered so far, have really weird orbits. They are highly elongated, and tipped significantly to the plane of the solar system. The authors of the study call them Extreme TNOs.
Their orbits are difficult to explain from what we know about the solar system now. However, the authors note that there is a comet called 96/P Machholz 1 that also has an odd orbit. It goes around the Sun backward (retrograde) relative to the planets, and the shape and orientation of its orbit change over time. This is due to the influence of Jupiter; the comet’s orbit takes it out as far from the Sun as Jupiter’s orbit, so the huge planet pokes and prods the comet over time. This changes the comet’s orbit, making it undergo all sorts of peculiar behavior.
The authors then speculate that the weird TNOs may be explainable in a similar way. The TNOs fall into four groups according to distance, implying a series of planets at distances ranging from 40 to 150 billion kilometers from the Sun. (For comparison, Neptune is about 4.5 billion km out.) They don’t give specifics about the possible masses these planets would need, except to say they would need “at least several Earth masses” to affect the TNOs.
Again, the evidence they present is interesting, maybe even compelling, but it by no means is proof. They only look at the orbital characteristics of about a dozen extreme TNOs, and it’s hard to extrapolate safely from that. It seems clear something odd is going on, but the mechanism behind it isn’t clear. Planets? Maybe. But it could be something else.
I’ll note that a similar study was done with long period comets, which also found weird orbital characteristics that could be explained by a planet or planets past Neptune affecting their orbits. Unfortunately, this too relied on small number statistics and is interesting but not conclusive.
If these planets exist they can’t be too much bigger than Earth. Otherwise they’d have been seen by now; the NASA infrared survey observatory WISE has shown that no more Jupiter- or Saturn-sized planets can exist in our solar system, even way far out.
Personally, I’d love to have direct evidence of such planets. When I worked with Hubble, I spent some time trying to figure out ways of finding such planets! There’s no real theoretical reason they don’t exist, and we see evidence of planets orbiting other stars at great distances. So why not?
In the end, this research is perhaps motivation to keep looking. Even big planets would be terribly faint and difficult to detect at 150 billion km, so it may be quite a while before we have a confidently complete survey of the solar system. And even if they don’t exist, I’m glad people are still thinking about things like this. It’s best in science not to get too complacent with the “current understanding.” Nature is tricky and a lot more clever than we are.
from Bad Astronomy http://ift.tt/1xxC1Xc
via IFTTT
2015年1月20日 星期二
Google and Fidelity Invest $1 Billion in SpaceX
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1JaOky3
via IFTTT
Good Thing We Waited 14 Years to Launch Goresat
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/15v1ObO
via IFTTT
Antares Rocket Rolls Out at NASA's Wallops Flight Facility
International Space Station Awaits Orbital-1 Resupply Mission
Volcanic Plume Over Southern Atlantic Ocean Revealed Through False-Color Imagery
Tracking and Data Relay Satellite Launches
The U.S. Gulf Coast at Night
Supermoon in Washington
Soyuz Rolls Out to Launch Pad
Round and Round
SpaceX Launches to the International Space Station
Western Sahara Viewed From International Space Station
Saturn's North Polar Hexagon
IRIS Launch Set for Thursday
Global Precipitation Measurement Core Observatory Aboard H-IIA Rocket
Election Day 2012
Spurting Plasma
Great Sandy Desert, Australia
Astronaut Chris Cassidy Takes a Photo
Taking Flight at Cape Canaveral
Coastal Flooding in New Zealand, Early March
Helios-A Solar Probe At Launch Complex
Windswept Valleys in Northern Africa
X-48 Project Completes Flight Research
NASA's Next Mars Mission Arrives at Kennedy Space Center for Launch Processing
NASA’s Mars Spacecraft Maneuvers to Prepare for Close Comet Flyby
July 25, 2014
from NASA http://ift.tt/1xcBycA
via IFTTT
New NASA Science Arrives at Space Station Aboard Orbital Sciences Cygnus Spacecraft
January 12, 2014
from NASA http://ift.tt/KX3zUI
via IFTTT
NASA Selects Contractor for Financial Support Services
September 10, 2014
from NASA http://ift.tt/1ty4zOT
via IFTTT
Long-Running NASA/CNES Ocean Satellite Takes Final Bow
July 03, 2013
from NASA http://ift.tt/155RhCN
via IFTTT
NASA Selects Stellar Interns as Student Ambassadors
February 28, 2014
from NASA http://ift.tt/1dKaKH9
via IFTTT
NASA Aircraft Take to Skies over Houston for Air Pollution Study
August 15, 2013
from NASA http://ift.tt/127Peto
via IFTTT
NASA's Kepler Telescope Discovers First Earth-Size Planet in 'Habitable Zone'
April 17, 2014
from NASA http://ift.tt/1qPWJjb
via IFTTT
Astronauts Practice Launching in NASA's New Orion Spacecraft
September 27, 2013
from NASA http://ift.tt/1eMUda4
via IFTTT
The Moon, In Depth
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1xT43v2
via IFTTT
NASA Joins White House, from Ground and Space, to Discuss State of STEM Education in America
January 20, 2015
from NASA http://ift.tt/15tzarA
via IFTTT
Astronaut Buzz Aldrin in the Apollo 11 Lunar Module
New Dawn images of Ceres: comparable to Hubble
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1xtxzsl
via IFTTT
NASA's Pluto Mission Seeks to Confuse People
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1ByTrJt
via IFTTT
Pretty Picture: Comet Lovejoy
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/1ElsLtW
via IFTTT
Why NASA Did Not Pick SNC
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1ztALdg
via IFTTT
Please Consider Supporting "Fight for Space"
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/1ztALdb
via IFTTT
Dawn Approaches Ceres
Ceres is the largest asteroid in the solar system—about 970 km in diameter—but so far from Earth that it generally just looks like a blurry disk at best.
But that’s about to change. A lot. The Dawn spacecraft is slowly edging toward the asteroid, and on Jan. 13, 2015 it took a series (haha! I love homonyms) of images that have been stitched together to make this nifty animation:
Dawn was about 383,000 km (238,000 miles) from Ceres when it took those shots, which is the same distance the Earth is from the Moon. Details are still difficult to make out (the pictures were taken with the framing camera, which has lower resolution than the science camera that will be used) but you can see a bright spot (I suspect the same one seen in earlier Hubble images) and some large craters. You can also see Ceres is noticeably flattened; it’s about seven percent wider across the equator than through the poles (though to be fair I think that looks a bit exaggerated due to the location of the terminator, the day-night line).
These images are tantalizing—they rival but don’t quite surpass the best images of Ceres taken by Hubble—but in a little while we’ll be seeing much, much more detailed images of this world. It’ll eventually orbit only a few hundred kilometers over the surface, and the images returned will be quite high resolution indeed.
Dawn launched in 2007 after an interesting history (it was canceled by NASA, then reinstated), and reached the asteroid Vesta in 2011. It orbited Vesta for over a year, mapping its surface in exquisite detail. It left Vesta in September 2012, and spent the next couple of years moving toward Ceres. It’s approaching now, and is expected to achieve orbit in early March.
Dawn uses an innovative engine called an ion drive. Any engine to move a spacecraft uses Newton’s Third Law of Motion: Every action has an opposite and equal reaction. If you throw something really hard in one direction, it pushes on you equally hard in the opposite direction.
Rockets usually combine a huge amount of chemicals together, which get very hot, expand rapidly, and blow out the back of the rocket. This is a pretty violent effect, and produces a lot of thrust.
Ion engines are different. They use either magnets or electric fields to accelerate and shoot individual atoms out the back of the engine. The atoms have a lot less mass than what’s used in chemical rockets, but they move a lot faster. The overall effect is a very low but extremely efficient thrust, and you can keep the engine blowing out atoms for years at a time, building up a huge speed. Dawn’s engines use an electric field to fling out xenon ions, and its fuel tank only carries about 425 kg (940 pounds) of fuel; in a day it only uses about 280 grams.
But that’s why it’s taken so long to go from Vesta to Ceres; it thrusts low but long. Now it’s approaching the giant asteroid, and soon it will go from a fuzzy disk to a fantastically detailed and amazing world. Stay tuned. This is going to be great.
from Bad Astronomy http://ift.tt/1umRQnY
via IFTTT