2016年9月1日 星期四
Ceres' Mountain Ahuna Mons: Side View
SpaceX's Falcon 9 rocket explosion: What we know and don't know
from Planetary Society Blog http://ift.tt/2bWnTYx
via IFTTT
Explosion at Test Stand Causes Loss of SpaceX Rocket
This morning (Friday, Sep. 1, 2016) at around 09:00 EDT, a SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket exploded while being fueled up for an engine test firing at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center in Florida. At this time, I have no info on what happened, except that the explosion occurred three minutes before the test was scheduled. The rocket was uncrewed and no one was near the pad, so no one was injured. However, it appears that the payload, an Israeli communications satellite called AMOS-6, was lost. The launch was to have been on Sep. 3.
My colleague Susan Matthews at Slate has more information.
This is bad, have no doubt. It will delay the launch schedule for SpaceX for months to come, including the first flight of the Falcon Heavy, a huge rocket that was supposed to launch late this year, and the first flight of a previously used first stage booster that re-landed after being used in a launch. There have been 28 Falcon 9 launches with two failures (if you include this one, and again we don't know the cause, and it wasn't during launch).
I suggest following SpaceX and Eric Berger on Twitter for updates. I'll post more information when I can.
from Bad Astronomy http://ift.tt/2c3XgQ6
via IFTTT
NASA OIG Report On Commercial Crew Certification
NASA OIG: NASA'S Commercial Crew Program: Update on Development and Certification Efforts
"Moreover, both companies must satisfy NASA's safety review process to ensure they meet Agency human-rating requirements. As part of the certification process, Boeing and SpaceX conduct safety reviews and report to NASA on potential hazards and their plans for mitigating risks. We found significant delays in NASA's evaluation and approval of these hazard reports and related requests for variances from NASA requirements that increase the risk costly redesign work may be required late in development, which could further delay certification. Although NASA's goal is to complete its review within 8 weeks of receipt of a hazard report, the contractors told us reviews can take as long as 6 months. We also found NASA does not monitor the overall timeliness of its safety review process. Given delays in the Commercial Crew Program, NASA has extended its contract with Roscosmos for astronaut transportation through 2018 at an additional cost of $490 million or $82 million a seat for six more seats. If the Program experiences additional delays, NASA may need to buy additional seats from Russia to ensure a continued U.S. presence on the ISS."
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/2bY0684
via IFTTT
ISS Daily Summary Report – 08/31/2016
September 01, 2016 at 12:00AM
from NASA http://ift.tt/2bXUcnw
via IFTTT
Explosion Reported at SpaceX SLC-40 Pad
Keith's note: Multiple reports from Cape Canaveral AIr Force Station report that a Falcon 9 rocket exploded this morning. NASA has confirmed an explosion - but not specifically that of a Falcon 9. More details to follow. The 45th Space Wing has reported that there are no casualties. The explosion likely occurred during a static fire test of the rocket's engines according to early reports.
US EVA37: Twitter user Ian Dawson posts this shot: http://pic.twitter.com/s28GCs10V3
— William Harwood (@cbs_spacenews) September 1, 2016
from NASA Watch http://ift.tt/2bXSzWK
via IFTTT